3a38cc8f0a
Expected data were re-written by using LibreOffice 5 as a reference. We kept only 8 decimals, because this is the precision used in tests, and it's easier to read without scientific notation. Also a few expected values were wrong so they were changed. The correct expected values were confirmed by both LibreOffice 5 and wolframalpha.com. Finally fixed an actual bug in code were a NaN value were returned instead of the correct `#NUM!`.
24 lines
429 B
Plaintext
24 lines
429 B
Plaintext
1.5, -1, "#NUM!"
|
|
2.5, 0, 0.49807036
|
|
2.5, 1, 0.14591814
|
|
2.5, 2, -0.38133585
|
|
3.5, 1, 0.41018842
|
|
3.5, 3, -0.35833535
|
|
3.5, 2, 0.04537144
|
|
12.5, 0, -0.17121431
|
|
1.5, "XYZ", "#VALUE!"
|
|
"ABC", 3, "#VALUE!"
|
|
-3.5, 1, "#NUM!"
|
|
-0.735, 1, "#NUM!"
|
|
0, 1, "#NUM!"
|
|
1.5, 1, -0.41230863
|
|
2.5, 1, 0.14591814
|
|
3.5, 1, 0.41018842
|
|
-9, 2, "#NUM!"
|
|
-0.735, 2, "#NUM!"
|
|
0, 2, "#NUM!"
|
|
0.9, 2, -1.94590960
|
|
1.9, 2, -0.66987868
|
|
3.5, 2, 0.04537144
|
|
4, 5, -0.79585142
|