3a38cc8f0a
Expected data were re-written by using LibreOffice 5 as a reference. We kept only 8 decimals, because this is the precision used in tests, and it's easier to read without scientific notation. Also a few expected values were wrong so they were changed. The correct expected values were confirmed by both LibreOffice 5 and wolframalpha.com. Finally fixed an actual bug in code were a NaN value were returned instead of the correct `#NUM!`.
39 lines
719 B
Plaintext
39 lines
719 B
Plaintext
1.5, -1, "#NUM!"
|
|
0, 2, "#NUM!"
|
|
0.1, 3, 7990.01243278
|
|
1, 0, 0.42102444
|
|
1.5, 0, 0.21380557
|
|
-1.5, 2, "#NUM!"
|
|
1.5, 1, 0.27738780
|
|
1.5, 2, 0.58365597
|
|
2.3, 1.5, 0.09498245
|
|
2.5, 1, 0.07389082
|
|
3.5, 1, 0.02223939
|
|
3.5, 3, 0.05916182
|
|
3, 9, 397.95880106
|
|
3.5, 2, 0.03230712
|
|
1.5, "XYZ", "#VALUE!"
|
|
"ABC", 3, "#VALUE!"
|
|
-3.5, 1, "#NUM!"
|
|
-0.735, 1, "#NUM!"
|
|
0, 1, "#NUM!"
|
|
0.035, 1, 28.50197000
|
|
1.5, 1, 0.27738780
|
|
2.5, 1, 0.07389082
|
|
3.5, 1, 0.02223939
|
|
-9, 2, "#NUM!"
|
|
-0.735, 2, "#NUM!"
|
|
0, 2, "#NUM!"
|
|
0.9, 2, 2.07902715
|
|
1.9, 2, 0.29690930
|
|
0.035, 2, 1632.15370729
|
|
3.5, 2, 0.03230712
|
|
4, 2, 0.01740143
|
|
0.035, 3, 186560.35423214
|
|
0.7, 3, 21.97216905
|
|
0.89, 3, 10.31747315
|
|
4, 3, 0.02988492
|
|
4, 5, 0.15434255
|
|
1.5, 7, 2457.70043955
|
|
3, 9, 397.95880106
|