3a38cc8f0a
Expected data were re-written by using LibreOffice 5 as a reference. We kept only 8 decimals, because this is the precision used in tests, and it's easier to read without scientific notation. Also a few expected values were wrong so they were changed. The correct expected values were confirmed by both LibreOffice 5 and wolframalpha.com. Finally fixed an actual bug in code were a NaN value were returned instead of the correct `#NUM!`. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Calculation | ||
| Cell | ||
| Reader | ||
| Shared | ||
| Style | ||
| CalculationBinaryComparisonOperation.data | ||
| CellAbsoluteCoordinate.data | ||
| CellAbsoluteReference.data | ||
| CellBuildRange.data | ||
| CellCoordinates.data | ||
| CellExtractAllCellReferencesInRange.data | ||
| CellGetRangeBoundaries.data | ||
| CellRangeBoundaries.data | ||
| CellRangeDimension.data | ||
| CellSplitRange.data | ||
| ColumnIndex.data | ||
| ColumnString.data | ||