PhpSpreadsheet/tests/rawTestData/Calculation/Engineering/BESSELY.data

1.5,	-1,	"#NUM!"
2.5,	0,	0.49807036
2.5,	1,	0.14591814
2.5,	2,	-0.38133585
3.5,	1,	0.41018842
3.5,	3,	-0.35833535
3.5,	2,	0.04537144
12.5,	0,	-0.17121431
1.5,	"XYZ",	"#VALUE!"
"ABC",	3,	"#VALUE!"
-3.5,	1,	"#NUM!"
-0.735,	1,	"#NUM!"
0,	1,	"#NUM!"
1.5,	1,	-0.41230863
2.5,	1,	0.14591814
3.5,	1,	0.41018842
-9,	2,	"#NUM!"
-0.735,	2,	"#NUM!"
0,	2,	"#NUM!"
0.9,	2,	-1.94590960
1.9,	2,	-0.66987868
3.5,	2,	0.04537144
4,	5,	-0.79585142
Fix unit tests for BESSEL functions Expected data were re-written by using LibreOffice 5 as a reference. We kept only 8 decimals, because this is the precision used in tests, and it's easier to read without scientific notation. Also a few expected values were wrong so they were changed. The correct expected values were confirmed by both LibreOffice 5 and wolframalpha.com. Finally fixed an actual bug in code were a NaN value were returned instead of the correct `#NUM!`. 2016-07-31 13:07:05 +00:00			`1.5, -1, "#NUM!"`
			`2.5, 0, 0.49807036`
			`2.5, 1, 0.14591814`
			`2.5, 2, -0.38133585`
			`3.5, 1, 0.41018842`
			`3.5, 3, -0.35833535`
			`3.5, 2, 0.04537144`
			`12.5, 0, -0.17121431`
			`1.5, "XYZ", "#VALUE!"`
			`"ABC", 3, "#VALUE!"`
			`-3.5, 1, "#NUM!"`
			`-0.735, 1, "#NUM!"`
			`0, 1, "#NUM!"`
			`1.5, 1, -0.41230863`
			`2.5, 1, 0.14591814`
			`3.5, 1, 0.41018842`
			`-9, 2, "#NUM!"`
			`-0.735, 2, "#NUM!"`
			`0, 2, "#NUM!"`
			`0.9, 2, -1.94590960`
			`1.9, 2, -0.66987868`
			`3.5, 2, 0.04537144`
			`4, 5, -0.79585142`