PhpSpreadsheet/unitTests/rawTestData/Calculation/Engineering/BESSELJ.data

1.5,	-1,	"#NUM!"
0,	1,	0.00000000
1,	1,	0.44005059
1,	5,	0.00024976
1.9,	2,	0.32992573
-2.5,	1.5,	-0.49709410
3.5,	1,	0.13737753
0.89,	3,	0.01397400
3.5,	2,	0.45862918
1.5,	"XYZ",	"#VALUE!"
"ABC",	3,	"#VALUE!"
-3.5,	1,	-0.13737753
-0.735,	1,	-0.34323578
0,	1,	0.00000000
0.035,	1,	0.01749732
1.5,	1,	0.55793651
2.5,	1,	0.49709410
3.5,	1,	0.13737753
-9,	2,	0.14484734
-0.735,	2,	0.06453896
0,	2,	0.00000000
0.9,	2,	0.09458630
1.9,	2,	0.32992573
0.035,	2,	0.00015311
3.5,	2,	0.45862918
4,	2,	0.36412815
0.035,	3,	0.00000089
0.7,	3,	0.00692965
0.89,	3,	0.01397400
4,	3,	0.43017147
4,	5,	0.13208666
1.5,	7,	0.00002468
3,	9,	0.00008440
Fix unit tests for BESSEL functions Expected data were re-written by using LibreOffice 5 as a reference. We kept only 8 decimals, because this is the precision used in tests, and it's easier to read without scientific notation. Also a few expected values were wrong so they were changed. The correct expected values were confirmed by both LibreOffice 5 and wolframalpha.com. Finally fixed an actual bug in code were a NaN value were returned instead of the correct `#NUM!`. 2016-07-31 13:07:05 +00:00			`1.5, -1, "#NUM!"`
			`0, 1, 0.00000000`
			`1, 1, 0.44005059`
			`1, 5, 0.00024976`
			`1.9, 2, 0.32992573`
			`-2.5, 1.5, -0.49709410`
			`3.5, 1, 0.13737753`
			`0.89, 3, 0.01397400`
			`3.5, 2, 0.45862918`
			`1.5, "XYZ", "#VALUE!"`
			`"ABC", 3, "#VALUE!"`
			`-3.5, 1, -0.13737753`
			`-0.735, 1, -0.34323578`
			`0, 1, 0.00000000`
			`0.035, 1, 0.01749732`
			`1.5, 1, 0.55793651`
			`2.5, 1, 0.49709410`
			`3.5, 1, 0.13737753`
			`-9, 2, 0.14484734`
			`-0.735, 2, 0.06453896`
			`0, 2, 0.00000000`
			`0.9, 2, 0.09458630`
			`1.9, 2, 0.32992573`
			`0.035, 2, 0.00015311`
			`3.5, 2, 0.45862918`
			`4, 2, 0.36412815`
			`0.035, 3, 0.00000089`
			`0.7, 3, 0.00692965`
			`0.89, 3, 0.01397400`
			`4, 3, 0.43017147`
			`4, 5, 0.13208666`
			`1.5, 7, 0.00002468`
			`3, 9, 0.00008440`